nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP4 Space
From: Stan Barber <sob () academ com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:44:30 -0600
On Mar 4, 2010, at 1:30 PM, William Herrin wrote:
Because we expect far fewer end users to multihome tomorrow than do today? Regards, Bill Herrin
I would suggest that the ratio of folks that will multihome under IPv6 versus those that won't will get smaller. I base that on an assumption that NAT (as we know it today) will be less prevalent as IPv6 usage grows.
Current thread:
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie, (continued)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Saku Ytti (Mar 07)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Owen DeLong (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Saku Ytti (Mar 07)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Owen DeLong (Mar 07)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Owen DeLong (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 07)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Mark Newton (Mar 07)
- Re: IP4 Space Stan Barber (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Steve Bertrand (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Steve Bertrand (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Christopher Morrow (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Joel Jaeggli (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 05)