nanog mailing list archives
Re: Recommendation in Australia for ISPs to force user security?
From: Jens Link <lists () quux de>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:50:17 +0200
Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com> writes:
not sure how they propose to enforce that, instrumentation approaches that look inside the home gateway have a non-trivial falsh positive rate and you've got a lot more hosts than ip addresses.
Well you force your users to install some software to control that you have a current anti virus and a firewall in place. This software will only run for certain versions of Windows and will have quite a lot of CVE entrys. I will never get access to such a network. I don't use anti virus and I don't have a firewall on my Laptop (by default I'm only running sshd and if I need a (t)ftpd I start it manually). Jens -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Foelderichstr. 40 | 13595 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264 | | http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jenslink () guug de | ------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: Recommendation in Australia for ISPs to force user security? Mark Smith (Jun 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Recommendation in Australia for ISPs to force user security? Mark Newton (Jun 22)
- Re: Recommendation in Australia for ISPs to force user security? Jens Link (Jun 22)