nanog mailing list archives
Re: Monitoring tools for IPv6 tools
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:57:45 -0700
On 7/31/10 12:20 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:04:16 +0800, Diogo Montagner said:This was the best compilation that I found before. Unfortunately, this presentation is a little bit old (2006). I am supposing that most of commercial tools have improved your IPv6 support.Dunno. Were the customers pressuring the vendors to improve the IPv6 support, or were they letting it slide because they didn't plan to deploy IPv6 till 2012 or so? ;)
Personally, I stopped pressuring vendors that didn't support IPv6, preferring to drop the completely and pick up one with equal or better service who did. Sometimes this was easy, sometimes it was exceedingly difficult. In every case when they asked why I said it was the lack of IPv6 support because I've been running a dual stack network for years, not as part of some future plan. ~Seth
Current thread:
- Monitoring tools for IPv6 tools Diogo Montagner (Jul 30)
- Re: Monitoring tools for IPv6 tools Vesna Manojlovic (Jul 30)
- Re: Monitoring tools for IPv6 tools Patrick Darden (Jul 30)
- Re: Monitoring tools for IPv6 tools Diogo Montagner (Jul 30)
- Re: Monitoring tools for IPv6 tools Patrick Darden (Jul 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Monitoring tools for IPv6 tools nanogf . (Jul 30)
- Re: Monitoring tools for IPv6 tools Diogo Montagner (Jul 30)
- Re: Monitoring tools for IPv6 tools Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 31)
- Re: Monitoring tools for IPv6 tools Seth Mattinen (Jul 31)
- Re: Monitoring tools for IPv6 tools Diogo Montagner (Jul 30)
- Re: Monitoring tools for IPv6 tools Vesna Manojlovic (Jul 30)