nanog mailing list archives
Re: 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:55:30 -0400
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:45:03 EDT, Atticus said:
What world do live in? Yes, we extend the life of IPv4 by increasing the numeric range. As for "only needing port 80", I'm not really sure where you've been for the last decade or so.
I hate to say this, but all of you who are actually thinking about stealing bits from IPv4 headers when IPv6 is already here: Look who started the "ONE bit or TWO bits" thread. YHBT. HAND. ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care? IPv3.com (Jul 24)
- Re: 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care? Steven King (Jul 24)
- Re: 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care? William Pitcock (Jul 24)
- Re: 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care? Christopher Morrow (Jul 24)
- Re: 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care? Tom Limoncelli (Jul 29)
- Re: 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care? Atticus (Jul 29)
- Re: 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care? Atticus (Jul 29)
- Re: 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 29)
- Re: 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care? Atticus (Jul 29)
- Re: 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 29)
- Re: 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care? William Pitcock (Jul 24)
- Re: 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care? Steven King (Jul 24)
- Re: 33-Bit Addressing via ONE bit or TWO bits ? does NANOG care? Matthew Palmer (Jul 30)