nanog mailing list archives

Re: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course


From: Tim Franklin <tim () pelican org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:44:45 +0100

Jeroen Massar wrote:

See my earlier comments on "upsell" and "control".  While you
have some ISPs starting from the mentality that gives us "accepting
incoming connections is a chargeable extra", they're also going
to be convinced that there's a revenue opportunity in segmenting
customers who want N of some resource from those who want 2N, 4N, ...
 That the resource in question is, for all practical purposes, both
free and infinite (cue someone with a 'tragedy of the commons'
analysis) does not factor - if they want more, they must pay more!

Ever thought about this tiny thing called BANDWIDTH USAGE?

[snip]

Thus don't charge folks for the amount of IP addresses they have, that
is not what you get charged for by your transit/peers either.

Apologies - again, my sarcasm doesn't travel well.  I don't think
selling IP addresses is a good idea - it's an idea I hit against and get
annoyed by in the IPv4 world that I expect at least some ISPs to try and
perpetuate into the IPv6 world.

Regards,
Tim.



Current thread: