nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv4 Exhaustion...
From: Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:02:13 -0400
CALEA is not a time machine. When an order is received, the "collection agency" starts receiving traffic; nothing (or at most, very little) is known prior to the wiretap order. Put another way, you cannot be ordered to produce tapes of phone call that happened a month ago. (CALEA only says you must have the ability to monitor anyone; not that you must be monitoring everyone to have "stuff" available before being asked for it.)
Another point about CALEA is that you don't *have* to have infrastructure in place in advance of the order. You simply have to provide Law Enforcement the wiretaps they are asking for -- however you accomplish it. You don't need to solve for every case, just the case they ask of you at the time. This keeps the cost of compliance way down (provided you don't need these for a significant percentage of your user base). Between e-discovery and RIAA issues, retention times are probably shrinking even though capacity for retention is growing. Deepak Jain AiNET
Current thread:
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion..., (continued)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Ricky Beam (Jul 23)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Leo Vegoda (Jul 23)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Owen DeLong (Jul 24)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Christopher Morrow (Jul 24)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 24)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Christopher Morrow (Jul 24)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Ricky Beam (Jul 26)
- RE: IPv4 Exhaustion... Deepak Jain (Jul 26)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Ricky Beam (Jul 26)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Ricky Beam (Jul 26)
- RE: IPv4 Exhaustion... Deepak Jain (Jul 26)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Rubens Kuhl (Jul 26)