nanog mailing list archives

RE: IPv4 Exhaustion...

From: "Lee Howard" <lee () asgard org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:43:39 -0400

"Your subpoena is overly broad.  Go back and specify port number and 
timestamp.  And read draft-ford-shared-addressing-issues-02, section
10."

RIAA should be IPv6 activists.

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Positively Optimistic [mailto:positivelyoptimistic () gmail com]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 1:11 PM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: IPv4 Exhaustion...

How do ISPs  handle RIAA notices when NATTING customers.. ?   We have
several customers that don't require public address space that could be
moved to private..   We're reluctant to make the move due to legal
liabilities..

Current thread:

IPv4 Exhaustion... Positively Optimistic (Jul 23)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... David E. Smith (Jul 23)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... William Herrin (Jul 23)
- RE: IPv4 Exhaustion... Lee Howard (Jul 23)
  - Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Ricky Beam (Jul 26)
    - Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Michael Thomas (Jul 26)
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... nick hatch (Jul 23)
  - Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Barry Shein (Jul 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... khatfield (Jul 23)
  - Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Steven Bellovin (Jul 23)
    - Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Ricky Beam (Jul 23)
    - Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Leo Vegoda (Jul 23)
    - Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Owen DeLong (Jul 24)
    - Re: IPv4 Exhaustion... Christopher Morrow (Jul 24)

(Thread continues...)