nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 30, Issue 50
From: jim deleskie <deleskie () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:44:07 -0300
This tread is starting to sound less and less operational, or maybe I'm just old and jaded and its to out to care. You wonder if maybe his legal dept or own moral views felt its wasn't worth the risk of some joker doing something "BAD" with the info so that the FBI could get involved. On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:31 PM, James Downs <egon () egon cc> wrote:
On Jul 19, 2010, at 4:08 PM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:The single host/box had bomb making info and hit lists. Yeah, I'd shut it down too if it was on my network. Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474As would any reasonable operator.Or maybe it would have been better to not destroy a known source, and work with the FBI to maximize its value. Cutting it off like that was short-sighted and stupid. -j
Current thread:
- RE: NANOG Digest, Vol 30, Issue 50 Nathan Eisenberg (Jul 19)
- Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 30, Issue 50 James Downs (Jul 19)
- Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 30, Issue 50 jim deleskie (Jul 19)
- Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 30, Issue 50 James Downs (Jul 19)