nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Economist, cyber war issue
From: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen () mompl net>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:57:08 -0700
andrew.wallace wrote:
Article: http://www.economist.com/node/16481504?story_id=16481504
I know it's shortsighted, but any article with the word cyber in it, used in such a way as being about "cyber this-or-that", already lost its credibility by virtue of using the word. It must be a of rather high quality to win back its credibility. This economist article sadly does the opposite.
Regards, Jeroen -- http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
Current thread:
- The Economist, cyber war issue Gadi Evron (Jul 01)
- Re: The Economist, cyber war issue andrew.wallace (Jul 01)
- Re: The Economist, cyber war issue Jeroen van Aart (Jul 01)
- Re: The Economist, cyber war issue andrew.wallace (Jul 01)
- Re: The Economist, cyber war issue Randy Bush (Jul 01)
- Re: The Economist, cyber war issue andrew.wallace (Jul 02)
- Re: The Economist, cyber war issue Randy Bush (Jul 02)
- Re: The Economist, cyber war issue Dmitry Burkov (Jul 04)
- Re: The Economist, cyber war issue Jeroen van Aart (Jul 01)
- Re: The Economist, cyber war issue andrew.wallace (Jul 01)