Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links

[David Barak <thegameiam () yahoo com>]

From: Mark Smith nanog () 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc nosense org

> Why can't IPv6 node addressing be as easy to understand and work with
> as Ethernet addresses? They were designed in the early 1980s*. 28 years
> or so years later, it's time for layer 3 addressing to catch up.

Becase Ethernet addresses are only locally significant, are not manually assigned in the vast majority of cases, and 
changing a MAC by replacing a NIC has no bearing on the configuration of a { server | router ACL | etc }.

Layer 3 addressing is globally significant, and the case we're discussing is addresses which are human-assigned rather 
than automatically configured.  Link-local autoconfiguration in IPv6 works like a champ, and behaves pretty much the 
way I would want it to.  Global addressing approaches, on the other hand, are highly optimized in directions which make 
them less flexible or have surprising consequences (hence this thread).
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise: 
http://www.listentothefranchise.com