RE: Using /126 for IPv6 router links

["TJ" <trejrco () gmail com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.lists () gmail com]
> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 22:38
> To: Owen DeLong
> Cc: nanog () nanog org
> Subject: Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
>
> > > Once you start planning a practical address plan, IPv6 isn't as big as
> > > everybody keeps saying...
> >
> > It's more than big enough for any deployment I've seen so far with
> plenty
> > of room to spare.
>
> Oh good! so the us-DoD's /10 request is getting filled when?

The US DoD has the equivalent of a /13 ... what is the question?
/TJ