nanog mailing list archives
RE: Experiences with Comcast Ethernet/Transit service
From: "Holmes,David A" <dholmes () mwdh2o com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 10:00:26 -0800
I do not know of Comcast's Ethernet services specifically, but a general problem with carrier Ethernet services that are based upon the Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) is that PIM-snooping is not implemented for multicast traffic. The absence of PIM-snooping results in the carrier's Ethernet service operating like a 1990's style Ethernet hub in which (S,G) multicast packets are incorrectly flooded out all user ports. If multicast traffic is to be used on the carrier Ethernet service, and there is more than one user location, then make sure that the carrier understands the implications of the lack of PIM-snooping support. -----Original Message----- From: Brandon Galbraith [mailto:brandon.galbraith () gmail com] Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 1:11 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Experiences with Comcast Ethernet/Transit service We're looking at using Comcast's (business) transit and private ethernet services at several client locations and I wanted to see what experiences others have had regarding this. Off-list replies are preferred. Thanks, -brandon -- Brandon Galbraith Mobile: 630.400.6992
Current thread:
- RE: Experiences with Comcast Ethernet/Transit service Holmes,David A (Jan 04)
- RE: Experiences with Comcast Ethernet/Transit service Antonio Querubin (Jan 04)
- RE: Experiences with Comcast Ethernet/Transit service Holmes,David A (Jan 04)
- Re: Experiences with Comcast Ethernet/Transit service Jared Mauch (Jan 04)
- RE: Experiences with Comcast Ethernet/Transit service Holmes,David A (Jan 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Experiences with Comcast Ethernet/Transit service Dave Temkin (Jan 04)
- Re: Experiences with Comcast Ethernet/Transit service Brent Jones (Jan 07)
- Re: Experiences with Comcast Ethernet/Transit service Bill Blackford (Jan 08)
- RE: Experiences with Comcast Ethernet/Transit service Antonio Querubin (Jan 04)