nanog mailing list archives
Re: d000::/8 from AS28716
From: Steve Bertrand <steve () ibctech ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:17:02 -0500
Mark Jackson wrote:
I'd say that is a bogus route/AS announcement. I see nothing in the address assignment for that. But I see traffic started originating around 12/15/2009.
I envision that work will be done in this regard shortly. God willing, our RIRs will be handing out prefixes to everyone from blocks that are specifically designed for 'that purpose'. It's interesting to know that since we are so virgin v6, that the RIRs should have no problem shelving up address space into an easy-to-document format. Although the RIRs can't dictate routing policy, routing/ops people can dictate what the RIR policy states. Then, Team Cymru will have an easy time laying base with an 'allowed' as opposed to a 'denied' list of addresses. Steve
Current thread:
- d000::/8 from AS28716 Chuck Anderson (Jan 11)
- Re: d000::/8 from AS28716 Scott Morris (Jan 11)
- Re: d000::/8 from AS28716 Mark Jackson (Jan 11)
- Re: d000::/8 from AS28716 Steve Bertrand (Jan 11)
- Re: d000::/8 from AS28716 Andree Toonk (Jan 11)
- Re: d000::/8 from AS28716 Pierfrancesco Caci (Jan 11)
- Re: d000::/8 from AS28716 James Hess (Jan 12)
- Re: d000::/8 from AS28716 Pierfrancesco Caci (Jan 12)
- Re: d000::/8 from AS28716 James Hess (Jan 12)