RE: D/DoS mitigation hardware/software needed.

["Stefan Fouant" <sfouant () shortestpathfirst net>]

Precisely - I was saying that in order to add more point to your argument.
I wasn't disagreeing with you :)

Stefan Fouant, CISSP, JNCIE-M/T
www.shortestpathfirst.net
GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D

> -----Original Message-----
> From: christopher.morrow () gmail com
> [mailto:christopher.morrow () gmail com] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 12:49 PM
> To: Stefan Fouant
> Cc: jul; NANOG
> Subject: Re: D/DoS mitigation hardware/software needed.
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Stefan Fouant
> <sfouant () shortestpathfirst net> wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.lists () gmail com]
> > > Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 2:05 AM
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:26 AM, jul <jul_bsd () yahoo fr> wrote:
> > > > Martin Hannigan wrote on 05/01/10 16:50:
> > > >
> > > > Outsourced services have higher cost than Arbor but can handled
> more.
> > > Do they? VerizonBusiness's solution was $3250US/month so ~$90USk
> over
> > > 2yrs. Arbor, I think, for a TMS + collectors was +100k.
> >
> > Don't forget to factor in OpEx.  This can often tilt the scales in
> favor of
> > one vs. the other.
>
> sure, but just capex alone the 'make vzb do this' option wins. (I
> think at least, I'm not a math guy though...)