nanog mailing list archives
RE: he.net down/slow?
From: "Brian Johnson" <bjohnson () drtel com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 13:51:41 -0600
On 7 Jan 2010, at 18:18, William Pitcock wrote:...why would you have that on a mailing list post?because the mail server that adds it is too dumb to differentiate between list and direct mail? f
Bingo! ;) - Brian CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, copying, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.
Current thread:
- he.net down/slow? Brian Johnson (Jan 07)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Brad Fleming (Jan 07)
- Re: he.net down/slow? William Pitcock (Jan 07)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Fearghas McKay (Jan 07)
- RE: he.net down/slow? Brian Johnson (Jan 07)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 07)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Dave Martin (Jan 08)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Martin Hannigan (Jan 09)
- Re: more inane confidentiality notices, was he.net down/slow? John Levine (Jan 09)
- Re: more inane confidentiality notices, was he.net down/slow? Martin Hannigan (Jan 09)
- Re: more inane confidentiality notices, was he.net down/slow? John R. Levine (Jan 09)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Fearghas McKay (Jan 07)
- Re: he.net down/slow? joel jaeggli (Jan 09)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Martin Hannigan (Jan 09)
- Re: he.net down/slow? James Hess (Jan 09)
- Re: he.net down/slow? goemon (Jan 09)