nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamhaus and Barracuda Networks BRBL
From: Dave Sparro <dsparro () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:40:52 -0500
On 2/22/2010 12:40 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Is it your position that, as a vendor of antispam services, nobody else should offer their services for a fee? That would be strange indeed
Actually I can sympathize with Barracuda on this one:Bob's Widgets is running thier own mail server for their 25 employees. They decide the need better spam filters. They can hire Bob's nephew to drop in a Linux server running Postfix and SpamAssassan. In this situation it's OK for Little Bobby to configure the Spamhaus RBLs for use on this solution. They could also hire Barracuda to do essentially the same thing (assumption based on source code published at http://source.barracuda.com/source/ ). In this case Bob's Widgets is not allowed to use Spamhaus.
Their list, their rules; but it is indeed strange to me. -- Dave
Current thread:
- Spamhaus and Barracuda Networks BRBL Dean Drako (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus and Barracuda Networks BRBL Bob Poortinga (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus and Barracuda Networks BRBL Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus and Barracuda Networks BRBL Dave Sparro (Feb 22)
- Re: Spamhaus and Barracuda Networks BRBL Larry Sheldon (Feb 22)
- Re: Spamhaus and Barracuda Networks BRBL Graeme Fowler (Feb 22)
- Re: Spamhaus and Barracuda Networks BRBL Jay Hennigan (Feb 22)
- Re: Spamhaus and Barracuda Networks BRBL Dave Sparro (Feb 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Spamhaus and Barracuda Networks BRBL Joel M Snyder (Feb 18)
- RE: Spamhaus and Barracuda Networks BRBL John Souvestre (Feb 18)