nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yahoo abuse
From: James Hess <mysidia () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:45:36 -0600
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:41 PM, J.D. Falk <jdfalk-lists () cybernothing org> wrote:
Some types of conversations simply don't take well to automation.
However, automatically indexing/archiving such conversations for future reference can be useful (and can assist participants to the conversation in looking up past similar conversations), and it is easier to archive and maintain accurate auditing of structured language than to implement natural language parsers. That said, XML makes a terrible data interchange format for communications where humans are supposed to understand the message, using standard software (such as a legacy e-mail client). YAML, or similar would be a more appropriate choice, and since it can be presented as plain text, many humans can understand the output simply by looking at it. -- -J
Current thread:
- Re: Yahoo abuse, (continued)
- Re: Yahoo abuse Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 09)
- Re: Yahoo abuse Matthew Petach (Feb 09)
- Re: Yahoo abuse Shane Short (Feb 09)
- Re: Yahoo abuse Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 09)
- RE: Yahoo abuse Jess Cohen (Feb 09)
- Re: Yahoo abuse J.D. Falk (Feb 09)
- Re: Yahoo abuse Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 09)
- Re: Yahoo abuse Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 09)
- Re: Yahoo abuse Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 09)
- Re: Yahoo abuse J.D. Falk (Feb 11)
- Re: Yahoo abuse James Hess (Feb 11)
- abuse reporting (was Re: Yahoo abuse) J.D. Falk (Feb 14)