nanog mailing list archives
Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations
From: "andrew.wallace" <andrew.wallace () rocketmail com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:58:44 -0800 (PST)
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:25 PM, <a.harrowell () gmail com> wrote:
-original message- Subject: Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations From: "andrew.wallace" <andrew.wallace () rocketmail com> Date: 04/02/2010 11:09 pm On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org> wrote:"That peer-review is the basic purpose of my Blackhat talk and the associated paper. I plan to review Cisco’s architecture for lawful intercept and explain the approach a bad guy would take to getting access without authorization. I’ll identify several aspects of the design and implementation of the Lawful Intercept (LI) and Simple Network Management Protocol Version 3 (SNMPv3) protocols that can be exploited to gain access to the interface, and provide recommendations for mitigating those vulnerabilities in design, implementation, and deployment." More here: http://blogs.iss.net/archive/blackhatlitalk.html Gadi.For the sake of clarity and transparency, Gadi Evron has absolutely no connection to this research whatsoever. He is famous in the security community for piggybacking off other peoples research. We are frustrated with him as much as we are annoyed. Andrew Security consultant CITATION NEEDED
You can goto Full-disclosure mailing list http://www.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure/ and ask about "Gadi Evron". There will be plenty folks there who will tell you he is involved in plagiarism. Andrew Security consultant
Current thread:
- Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations, (continued)
- Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations Steven Bellovin (Feb 04)
- Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations Marcus Reid (Feb 04)
- Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations Jorge Amodio (Feb 04)
- Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations Christopher Morrow (Feb 04)
- Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations Mark Smith (Feb 05)
- Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations isabel dias (Feb 06)
- Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations andrew.wallace (Feb 04)
- Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 08)
- Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations andrew.wallace (Feb 08)
- Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 08)
- Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations a . harrowell (Feb 04)
- Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations andrew.wallace (Feb 04)
- Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations Dan White (Feb 04)
- Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations Brian Keefer (Feb 04)
- Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations andrew.wallace (Feb 05)
- Re: lawful intercept/IOS at BlackHat DC, bypassing and recommendations andrew.wallace (Feb 04)