nanog mailing list archives

Re: Tsunami


From: JC Dill <jcdill.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:55:53 -0800

Marshall Eubanks wrote:
The Tsunami is big enough to be dangerous but seems not to be too major :
It depends on where you are located, not just how distant you are from Chili but also the angle. They are forecasting a cone-shaped zone of effect heading directly towards Hawaii. See:

http://nctr.pmel.noaa.gov/chile20100227/
http://nctr.pmel.noaa.gov/chile20100227/Chile2010.mov
http://nctr.pmel.noaa.gov/chile20100227/T1960_1-annotated.png

CNN reported a few minutes ago that the tsunami hit New Zealand about 1 hour ago. Hawaii is ~3 hours more distant (as the wave travels) from the location of the earthquake in Chili than New Zealand, so the expectation is that the wave will hit Hawaii a little later than first forecast.

ObNANOG: Does anyone know if transoceanic cable landing facilities are sited and built to resist damage a tsunami of a particular height/strength? (Thinking back to the video of the tsunami in the Indian Ocean on December 26, 2004.)

jc



Current thread: