nanog mailing list archives

RE: Some truth about Comcast - WikiLeaks style


From: "Rettke, Brian" <Brian.Rettke () cableone biz>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:15:52 -0700

This should also be a wake-up call that for whatever reason (who cares what for this discussion), if our bandwidth 
demands exceed our bandwidth supply, we must become more efficient at using our bandwidth. I'm hoping that we not only 
discuss peering and bandwidth, management and implementation, but look at the Content providers with the same level of 
scrutiny that we hold the Backbone transit providers to. We should look at video compression and codecs with the same 
level of urgency that we do bandwidth, because there will never be enough if both sides are not looked at.



Sincerely,

Brian A . Rettke
RHCT, CCDP, CCNP, CCIP
Network Engineer, CableONE Internet Services


-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jbates () brightok net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 6:05 PM
To: Adam Rothschild
Cc: Kevin Neal; nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Some truth about Comcast - WikiLeaks style

On 12/15/2010 4:47 PM, Adam Rothschild wrote:
Folk in
content/hosting should find this all more than a little bit scary.

So you don't think the money content providers will pay Comcast won't
reflect on other eyeball networks who aren't important/large enough to
request financing? ie, Comcast could run lower rates and offer better
service by charging the content provider, while competitive eyeball
networks won't get the option to receive compensation from content
providers and have to charge appropriate rates to their customers.


Jack



Current thread: