nanog mailing list archives
Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation.
From: Greg Whynott <Greg.Whynott () oicr on ca>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:12:12 -0500
update.. hoax it appears. http://www.itworld.com/open-source/130820/openbsdfbi-allegations-denied-named-participant -- This message and any attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Opinions, conclusions or other information contained in this message may not be that of the organization.
Current thread:
- Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation., (continued)
- Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. mikea (Dec 15)
- RE: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Stefan Fouant (Dec 15)
- Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. 'mikea' (Dec 15)
- Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Ben (Dec 15)
- Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Mike. (Dec 15)
- Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Bryan Irvine (Dec 15)
- Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Mike. (Dec 15)
- RE: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Stefan Fouant (Dec 15)
- Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. sthaug (Dec 15)
- Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Eitan Adler (Dec 15)
- Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Greg Whynott (Dec 15)
- Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Jimmy Hess (Dec 15)