nanog mailing list archives

Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation.

From: Chaim Rieger <chaim.rieger () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:39:02 -0800

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Wil Schultz <wschultz () bsdboy com> wrote:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/22557

This appears to be some serious FUD, but if true could have some serious implications for IPSEC stacks in all kinds 
of equipment.

-wil


Does anyone remember the last time a law enforcement agency had
someone sign a 10 year NDA on a backdoor?

"Oh, times up, I can post it on Facebook now.  Cool."

Current thread:

Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Wil Schultz (Dec 14)
- Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Chaim Rieger (Dec 14)
  - Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Ken Chase (Dec 14)
    - Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Michael J Wise (Dec 14)
    - Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. mikea (Dec 15)
    - RE: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Stefan Fouant (Dec 15)
    - Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. 'mikea' (Dec 15)
    - Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Ben (Dec 15)
    - Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Mike. (Dec 15)
    - Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Bryan Irvine (Dec 15)
    - Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Mike. (Dec 15)
    - RE: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation. Stefan Fouant (Dec 15)

(Thread continues...)