nanog mailing list archives
peering, derivatives, and big brother
From: Jeff Wheeler <jsw () inconcepts biz>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 13:36:08 -0500
A read through this New York Times article on derivatives clearing, and the exclusivity that big banks seek to maintain, would look very much like an article on large-scale peering, to someone who is not expert in both topics. The transit-free club and the "derivatives dealers club" may have other similarities in the future, and it's worth watching how further government regulation develops in this area. It may lead to insight into how government might eventually regulate ISPs seeking to become settlement-free. "“It appears that the membership criteria were set so that a certain group of market participants could meet that, and everyone else would have to jump through hoops,” Mr. Katz said." http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/12/business/12advantage.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&src=busln -- Jeff S Wheeler <jsw () inconcepts biz> Sr Network Operator / Innovative Network Concepts
Current thread:
- peering, derivatives, and big brother Jeff Wheeler (Dec 12)
- Re: peering, derivatives, and big brother Ken (Dec 12)
- RE: peering, derivatives, and big brother George Bonser (Dec 12)
- Re: peering, derivatives, and big brother Laurent GUERBY (Dec 13)
- RE: peering, derivatives, and big brother George Bonser (Dec 13)
- Re: peering, derivatives, and big brother Dorn Hetzel (Dec 13)
- Re: peering, derivatives, and big brother Steve Bertrand (Dec 16)
- Re: peering, derivatives, and big brother Laurent GUERBY (Dec 13)
- RE: peering, derivatives, and big brother Ryan Finnesey (Dec 15)
- Re: peering, derivatives, and big brother Jeff Wheeler (Dec 15)
- RE: peering, derivatives, and big brother George Bonser (Dec 15)