nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP multihoming question.
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 09:13:43 -0600
On 12/9/2010 5:32 AM, b2 wrote:
Hi , first sorry for lame question but i'm new to BGP. In my ISP I have two full BGP sessions with my two transit providers (X and Y), and for every provider i have assigned PA (Provider Aggregatable) networks. Is it possible (if there are no filters on other side) to advertise X networks to Y and Y to accept them ? My confusion comes from the PA status , i know if it is PI there are no problem to route it to any AS. Thanks.
If it's SWIP'd to you by your provider, it is yours to use, and most providers will accept it. The difference between them is paperwork; that's all.
Jack
Current thread:
- BGP attribute 128 activity Jared Mauch (Dec 07)
- BGP multihoming question. b2 (Dec 09)
- Re: BGP multihoming question. Gregory Edigarov (Dec 09)
- Re: BGP multihoming question. William Herrin (Dec 09)
- Re: BGP multihoming question. Jack Bates (Dec 09)
- RE: BGP multihoming question. Dylan Ebner (Dec 10)
- Re: BGP multihoming question. Bret Clark (Dec 10)
- RE: BGP multihoming question. George Bonser (Dec 10)
- Re: BGP multihoming question. Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 11)
- BGP multihoming question. b2 (Dec 09)