nanog mailing list archives

Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?

From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:35:37 -0800

On Dec 8, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:

In a message written on Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 07:30:52PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

I'm hoping to get some modest support here before jumping into the RIR policy shark tanks.

There is no RIR policy here.


Minimum PI allocation size.

Regards,
-drc

Current thread:

Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?, (continued)
- - - Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Jack Bates (Dec 08)
    - Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 08)
    - Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Owen DeLong (Dec 08)
    - Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? James Hess (Dec 08)
    - Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Owen DeLong (Dec 08)
    - Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Jack Bates (Dec 09)
  - Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 08)
    - Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Loránd Jakab (Dec 09)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Graham Beneke (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Leo Bicknell (Dec 08)
  - Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? David Conrad (Dec 08)
- Message not available
  - Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Jeff Wheeler (Dec 08)
    - RE: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? George Bonser (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Robert Bonomi (Dec 10)
  - Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Luigi Iannone (Dec 10)