nanog mailing list archives
Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:23:03 -0800
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:07 AM, George Bonser <gbonser () seven com> wrote:
Just move to v6, already. v4 is done. trying to keep it on life support is going to cost everyone time, money, and reduced life span due to increased stress.Exactly. People need to adopt the "v4 is done" mindset and work going forward on that premise.
+1 Good luck with that /27 of 1.0.0.0/8 space At the edge, with the down economy, i bet there are plenty of folks that are only accept /21s and shorter from their upstream ISP so they can get some more mileage out of their older gear. Cameron
Current thread:
- Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Matthew Petach (Dec 08)
- RE: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? George Bonser (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Cameron Byrne (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Seth Mattinen (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Cameron Byrne (Dec 08)
- RE: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? George Bonser (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Matthew Petach (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Brielle Bruns (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Owen DeLong (Dec 08)
- RE: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? George Bonser (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Owen DeLong (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 08)