nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51
From: Christian Pena <cpena () ststelecom com>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:12:53 -0500
I agree, I just joined the list today and was about to unsubscribe because of all the realtively useless posts <ducks behind Leo> "Leo Bicknell" <bicknell () ufp org> wrote:
I have a suggestion... Nanog Mailing List: Critical Operational Content vs. Break time Amusement *ducks* -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Current thread:
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51, (continued)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Jac Kloots (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Greg Whynott (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Tom Daly (Dec 07)
- RE: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 George Bonser (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Tom Daly (Dec 07)
- RE: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 George Bonser (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Tom Daly (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Greg Whynott (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Tom Daly (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 John Kristoff (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 Christian Pena (Dec 07)
- Re: Lightning Debates at NANOG 51 kris foster (Dec 07)