nanog mailing list archives
Re: Abuse@ contacts
From: Daniel Seagraves <dseagrav () humancapitaldev com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:14:40 -0600
On Dec 7, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Gavin Pearce wrote:
After a weekend of heavy spam last month, we decided to fire some reports over to the abuse contacts for each relevant IP or domain - some US/Europe based, others from more "obscure" locations. We've not had a reply from any of the reports sent over, other than some automated bounces. Each report from us contained detailed information about IP, date, headers, spam content, relevant ranges etc ... How many of you (honestly) actively manage and respond to abuse@ contact details listed in WHOIS? Or have had any luck with abuse@ contacts in the past? Who's good and who isn't?
I answer ours, and I've sent a few abuse complaints (sometimes in error...) I haven't kept count, but I'd say I get an answer at least 50% of the time.
Current thread:
- Abuse@ contacts Gavin Pearce (Dec 07)
- Re: Abuse@ contacts Simon Waters (Dec 07)
- Re: Abuse@ contacts Daniel Seagraves (Dec 07)
- Re: Abuse@ contacts Wayne Lee (Dec 07)
- Re: Abuse@ contacts Jason Bertoch (Dec 07)
- Re: Abuse@ contacts Rich Kulawiec (Dec 07)
- Re: Abuse@ contacts Joe Greco (Dec 07)
- Re: Abuse@ contacts Christopher Morrow (Dec 07)
- Re: Abuse@ contacts Shaun Ewing (Dec 07)
- Re: Abuse@ contacts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 07)