nanog mailing list archives

Re: Abuse@ contacts


From: Daniel Seagraves <dseagrav () humancapitaldev com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:14:40 -0600


On Dec 7, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Gavin Pearce wrote:

After a weekend of heavy spam last month, we decided to fire some
reports over to the abuse contacts for each relevant IP or domain - some
US/Europe based, others from more "obscure" locations.

We've not had a reply from any of the reports sent over, other than some
automated bounces. Each report from us contained detailed information
about IP, date, headers, spam content, relevant ranges etc ... 

How many of you (honestly) actively manage and respond to abuse@ contact
details listed in WHOIS? Or have had any luck with abuse@ contacts in
the past? Who's good and who isn't?

I answer ours, and I've sent a few abuse complaints (sometimes in error...)
I haven't kept count, but I'd say I get an answer at least 50% of the time.



Current thread: