nanog mailing list archives
Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message
From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 22:57:58 -0500 (EST)
Bill Manning saith:
who intimated that the OOB channel would be http? since that is based on the DNS, i'd like to think it was suspect as well. :)
No it's not, Bill, not *necessarily*; you know better than that. :-) Cheers, -- jra
Current thread:
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message - picking a fight, (continued)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message - picking a fight bmanning (Dec 28)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message - picking a fight Doug Barton (Dec 28)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message - picking a fight Tony Finch (Dec 29)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message - picking a fight bmanning (Dec 29)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Jay Ashworth (Dec 28)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 29)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Tony Finch (Dec 29)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 29)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message bmanning (Dec 29)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Tony Finch (Dec 30)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Jay Ashworth (Dec 30)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Jay Ashworth (Dec 28)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message jamie rishaw (Dec 27)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Jay Ashworth (Dec 28)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Kevin Oberman (Dec 28)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Jay Ashworth (Dec 28)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message Kevin Oberman (Dec 28)
- Re: .gov DNSSEC operational message bmanning (Dec 28)