nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:20:33 -0800
On 12/21/2010 14:18, Frank Bulk wrote:
There are 4,035 routes in the global IPv6 routing table. This is what one provider passed on to me for routes (/48 or larger prefixes), extracted from public route-view servers. AT&T AS7018: 2,851 (70.7%) Cogent AS174: 2,864 (71.0%) GLBX AS3549: 3,706 (91.8%) Hurricane Electric AS6939: 3,790 (93.9%) Qwest AS209: 3,918 (97.1%) TINET (formerly Tiscali) AS3257: 3,825 (94.8%) Verizon AS701: 3,938 (97.6%)
Does this mean Verizon is carrying PI /48s now? ~Seth
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Hank Nussbacher (Dec 21)
- RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Frank Bulk (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jared Mauch (Dec 21)
- RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Frank Bulk (Dec 21)
- RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Mike Tancsa (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Mike Tancsa (Dec 21)
- RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Frank Bulk - iName.com (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons ML (Dec 21)
- RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Randy Epstein (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Seth Mattinen (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jeff Wheeler (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Pekka Savola (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jeff Wheeler (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Bjoern A. Zeeb (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Pekka Savola (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jared Mauch (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Owen DeLong (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Seth Mattinen (Dec 23)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Scott Taylor (Dec 23)