nanog mailing list archives
Re: UN mulls internet regulation options
From: Fred Baker <fred () cisco com>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 17:12:33 -0800
On Dec 19, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
Well, if you have followed the news, it comes down to the fact that some of our old friends from WSIS/WGIG/IGF+ICANN/GAC "we're the government and we like the idea of being in charge" friends are at it again. In one corner, Brazil, China, South Africa, and Saudi Arabia; in the other, US, Austria, and so on. The current state of play is that the folk in the first corner would like an exclusive club, and a combination of parties including the folks in the second corner and a variety of civil society, industry, and etc parties and rocked the boat back in the direction of multi-stakeholder discussions. My prediction: the boat will keep rocking, and the "givmint" folks will try again. And again.s/again/still/
That too...
randy
Current thread:
- UN mulls internet regulation options Joseph Prasad (Dec 18)
- Re: UN mulls internet regulation options Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 19)
- Re: UN mulls internet regulation options Dave CROCKER (Dec 19)
- Re: UN mulls internet regulation options Fred Baker (Dec 19)
- Re: UN mulls internet regulation options Randy Bush (Dec 19)
- Re: UN mulls internet regulation options Eric Brunner-Williams (Dec 19)
- Re: UN mulls internet regulation options John Curran (Dec 19)
- Re: UN mulls internet regulation options Eric Brunner-Williams (Dec 20)
- Re: UN mulls internet regulation options Fred Baker (Dec 19)
- Re: UN mulls internet regulation options Fred Baker (Dec 19)
- Re: UN mulls internet regulation options Jorge Amodio (Dec 20)
- Re: UN mulls internet regulation options Randy Bush (Dec 20)
- Re: UN mulls internet regulation options Jorge Amodio (Dec 20)