nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Attribute 92 ?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:16:55 +0900
sigh. is this an attack by a black hat, or by an rir and researchers who do not know how to say "oops, sorreee!?"Or who do not know how to warn us in advance:
i really enjoy that that experiment pissed you off big-time. like you have the technical incompetence to think it was at all dangerous or a problem. if i took it personally, as you seem to, i would remove my zones from being secondaried on rip.psg.com. and i might do something about the many year storm of recursive dns requests to rip.psg.com (which does not recurse) from your friends. after all, who would want to [ab]use the services of someone you like to excoriate for doing no harm? what bullshit! randy
Current thread:
- BGP Attribute 92 ? Jared Mauch (Dec 16)
- Re: BGP Attribute 92 ? Rhys Rhaven (Dec 16)
- Re: BGP Attribute 92 ? Patrick Giagnocavo (Dec 16)
- Re: BGP Attribute 92 ? Randy Bush (Dec 16)
- Re: BGP Attribute 92 ? Patrick Giagnocavo (Dec 16)
- Re: BGP Attribute 92 ? Hank Nussbacher (Dec 18)
- Re: BGP Attribute 92 ? Randy Bush (Dec 18)
- Re: BGP Attribute 92 ? Randy Bush (Dec 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- BGP Attribute 92 ? Atticus (Dec 18)