nanog mailing list archives
Re: OT - NO (Non-Operational) Question
From: Joe Blanchard <jbfixurpc () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:37:06 -0600
Sorry to alll, Yes that in a nutshell woud be my question along with tracking it,, Thanks jay - Joe On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----From: "Andrew Haninger" <ahaning () mindspring com> To: "Joe Blanchard" <jbfixurpc () gmail com> Cc: nanog () nanog org Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 1:28:47 AM Subject: Re: OT - NO (Non-Operational) Question On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Joe Blanchard <jbfixurpc () gmail com> wrote:It appears there's really no easy way to determine the origin of a text sent to a cell...For shortcodes, Neustar provided a list:https://www.usshortcodes.com/csc/directory/directoryList.do?method=showDirectory&group=allFor regular cellular numbers, the Wireless Amber Alert site is popular amongst MVNO (e.g. prepaid) users to find out so they can use the email-to-text gateways: http://www.wirelessamberalerts.com/ (You don't actually sign up, just enter the number and then it will tell you the carrier.) For landlines/VoIP/etc. Google should be able to tell you at least the city/state. Though it's rare that you will get a text from a landline, it is possible.I could be wrong, but I think the actual question was "is it realistic to assume a text to a cellphone came from the number it *says* it came from?" and I think the answer is "no, there are a few ways to spoof it". Received SMS messages are probably not evidentiary, absent a report from the receiving carrier of the message traffic log involved, which would itself be hearsay unless someone testified about it. Cheers, -- jra
Current thread:
- OT - NO (Non-Operational) Question Joe Blanchard (Dec 16)
- Re: OT - NO (Non-Operational) Question Andrew Haninger (Dec 16)
- Re: OT - NO (Non-Operational) Question Jay Ashworth (Dec 16)
- Re: OT - NO (Non-Operational) Question Joe Blanchard (Dec 16)
- Re: OT - NO (Non-Operational) Question Joe Blanchard (Dec 16)
- Re: OT - NO (Non-Operational) Question Jay Ashworth (Dec 16)
- Re: OT - NO (Non-Operational) Question Andrew Haninger (Dec 16)