nanog mailing list archives
Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:00:48 +0900
something which can take a couple of hundred basic and extended ACLs and tell you these <ten> don't work these <twenty> conflict the remaining <x> have a sequence and can reduce to this basic <x-y> set
maybe you could go the other direction. as opposed to trying to digest and correct cruft, generate the acls from something reasonable so that they are canonic by construction. randy
Current thread:
- (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? George Michaelson (Aug 18)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Dobbins, Roland (Aug 18)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Christopher Morrow (Aug 18)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Randy Bush (Aug 18)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? George Michaelson (Aug 18)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Randy Bush (Aug 18)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? George Michaelson (Aug 18)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? George Michaelson (Aug 18)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Dobbins, Roland (Aug 18)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Cat Okita (Aug 19)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Christopher Morrow (Aug 19)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Cat Okita (Aug 19)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Christopher Morrow (Aug 19)
- Re: (cisco, or any) acl *reducers* out there? Christopher Morrow (Aug 19)