nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lightly used IP addresses
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 19:21:50 +0900
gosh, i must have completely misread section nineSeeking contractual rights contrary to IETF RFCs 2008 and 2150?
oh, and if you feel that you have those rights by other means than the lrsa, then why is section nine in the lrsa. just remove it. and then maybe more than a few percent of the legacy holders might actually be interested. your lawyer is gonna kill you. randy
Current thread:
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses, (continued)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Franck Martin (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Owen DeLong (Aug 14)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses bmanning (Aug 14)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses David Conrad (Aug 14)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses bmanning (Aug 14)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses David Conrad (Aug 14)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Owen DeLong (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Chris Grundemann (Aug 14)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 14)
- participation in process (Re: Lightly used IP addresses) Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 14)
- Re: participation in process (Re: Lightly used IP addresses) Owen DeLong (Aug 15)