nanog mailing list archives
RE: Lightly used IP addresses
From: Nathan Eisenberg <nathan () atlasnetworks us>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:49:35 +0000
Is this upstream going to cut that customer off and lose the revenue, just to satisfy ARIN's bleating?
Isn't this a little bit like an SSL daemon? One which refuses to process a revocation list on the basis of the function of the certificate is useless. The revocation list only has authority if the agent asks for and processes it. Would you use this SSL daemon, knowing that it had this bug? I would consider a transit provider who subverted an ARIN revocation to be disreputable, and seek other sources of transit. Best Regards, Nathan Eisenberg Atlas Networks, LLC
Current thread:
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses, (continued)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Greg Whynott (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Leslie (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Levine (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Dan White (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Ken Chase (Aug 13)
- RE: Lightly used IP addresses Aaron Wendel (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses JEff (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John R. Levine (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Ken Chase (Aug 13)
- RE: Lightly used IP addresses Nathan Eisenberg (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Marshall Eubanks (Aug 13)
- RE: Lightly used IP addresses William Pitcock (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Greg Whynott (Aug 13)
- RE: Lightly used IP addresses Nathan Eisenberg (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Ken Chase (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Jared Mauch (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Ken Chase (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Jared Mauch (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 13)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Chris Grundemann (Aug 14)