nanog mailing list archives
Re: DSL "aggregation".... NO
From: Jack Carrozzo <jack () crepinc com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:39:54 -0400
You can balance over DSL by putting different L2TPv3 tunnels over each physical device and agg it at someplace with real connections and such. It's possible to do it with GRE or OpenVPN too, but much less classy. Clearly the downside of this is that you need an agg machine on your end somewhere, but it gives you lots of control for sure. -Jack Carrozzo On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Bill Lewis <blewis () hottopic com> wrote:
Group, Since I'm told that DSL aggregation / mux is currently not possible, we are looking at doing stream splitting via a technology like FatPipe uses. Anyone have this in production usage? Or something similar? Cisco has offered some ways to split via CEF, but most DSL carriers do not have this turned on / available. Thank you, Bill Network dude
Current thread:
- DSL "aggregation".... NO Bill Lewis (Apr 15)
- Re: DSL "aggregation".... NO Jack Carrozzo (Apr 15)
- Re: DSL "aggregation".... NO Mark Smith (Apr 15)
- Re: DSL "aggregation".... NO Anton Kapela (Apr 18)
- Re: DSL "aggregation".... NO Truman Boyes (Apr 15)
- Re: DSL "aggregation".... NO Bill Stewart (Apr 15)
- Re: DSL "aggregation".... NO Bill Stewart (Apr 15)
- Re: DSL "aggregation".... NO Lamar Owen (Apr 16)
- Re: DSL "aggregation".... NO Jack Carrozzo (Apr 15)