nanog mailing list archives
RE: Solar Flux
From: "George Bonser" <gbonser () seven com>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 21:21:53 -0700
-----Original Message----- From: Pete Carah [mailto:pete () altadena net] Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2010 8:41 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Solar Flux And to top it all off, how many picojoules are stored in a modern ram cell compared to the same during the last sunspot peak. There is a hidden cost to memory density growth here... -- Pete
This cycle is currently predicted to be quite tame by recent standards. So far NASA is predicting cycle 24 to be much weaker than 23 was: http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/images/f107_predict.gif http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/predict.shtml
Current thread:
- Re: Solar Flux (was: Re: China prefix hijack) Warren Bailey (Apr 11)
- Re: Solar Flux Paul Vixie (Apr 11)
- Re: Solar Flux Pete Carah (Apr 11)
- RE: Solar Flux George Bonser (Apr 11)
- Re: Solar Flux Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 12)
- Re: Solar Flux Pete Carah (Apr 11)
- Re: Solar Flux Paul Vixie (Apr 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Solar Flux (was: Re: China prefix hijack) Leigh Porter (Apr 11)
- Re: Solar Flux (was: Re: China prefix hijack) Warren Bailey (Apr 11)