nanog mailing list archives
Re: Finding content in your job title
From: Lamar Owen <lowen () pari edu>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 13:13:30 -0400
On Friday 02 April 2010 12:25:12 pm Justin Horstman wrote:
[Your title] does however answer the question of "Who is responsible for..." which I believe to be extremely valuable.
Then again, I might be weird.
No, this is exactly how 'business at large' uses the idea of title. In some companies, Official Title is used to determine salary (or even whether you're an exempt employee or not). And the company's bylaws may invest particular responsibilities and privileges on particular people by title. Secretary, for instance, is a particular title used in bylaws for a particular purpose for an officer of the company. When troubleshooting an operational issue, which do you prefer: traceroutes with useful interface names (so you can locate them) or cutesy names? Would you prefer (for your eyes, of course; you do run split DNS, right?) POS1/0 on a 7206 used for PE in the data center be called pos1-0.dc1-7206- pe.example.com, or bhp.example.com (BHP=Big Honking Pipe)? I know, you might prefer bhp.example.com for other people's eyes, but suppose you didn't name it that, you're new on the job, the guy who named it is not available, and you are having problems. Then which is your preference? I guess what you want your title to be depends on what your role actually is in the company, and whether someone outside (or someone inside who doesn't know you) can find you when they need to using the company's directory or a second or third-hand business card (yes, I've done that too, make a photocopy or e-copy of a business card, and then pass it along to a third-party (after getting card holder's permission to do so) as a contact). Or when putting a card under the acrylic sheeting on the tables in a local restaurant (I've actually made useful connections reading the business cards on corkboards and under the Plexiglas at restaurants before). We have standardized abuse, postmaster, and webmaster e-mail aliases, too, and that works when you see a slow brute-forcer originating from somewhere, or someone has blackholed someone and their BGP announcements leak, or whatever. It's nice to get to the right person when you don't know the person, don't know the company, and don't have time to get 'into' the culture. So, I guess that your title should at least semi-adequately give your role to someone who is completely clueless about your role.
Current thread:
- Re: Finding content in your job title Jorge Amodio (Apr 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Finding content in your job title Brian Raaen (Apr 01)
- Re: Finding content in your job title Jimi Thompson (Apr 02)
- RE: Finding content in your job title Justin Horstman (Apr 02)
- Re: Finding content in your job title Lamar Owen (Apr 02)
- Re: Finding content in your job title Jeroen van Aart (Apr 07)
- Re: Finding content in your job title Larry Sheldon (Apr 07)
- Re: Finding content in your job title Jeroen van Aart (Apr 07)
- RE: Finding content in your job title Justin Horstman (Apr 02)
- Re: Finding content in your job title Steven Bellovin (Apr 07)
- Re: Finding content in your job title Owen DeLong (Apr 07)
- Re: Finding content in your job title Larry Sheldon (Apr 07)