nanog mailing list archives
Re: Important: IPv4 Future Allocation Concept RFC
From: "Greg D. Moore" <mooregr () greenms com>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:26:20 -0400
At 06:41 PM 4/1/2010, Joe Greco wrote:Ok, this is weird. I had suggested almost exactly this same scheme to someone else earlier today.
When did you put the bug in my office? Greg D. Moore President mooregr () greenms com Ask me about lily, an RPI based chat system: http://lilycore.sourceforge.net/Help honor our WWII Veterans: http://www.honorflight.org/
Current thread:
- Important: IPv4 Future Allocation Concept RFC Joe Greco (Apr 01)
- RE: Important: IPv4 Future Allocation Concept RFC Thomas Magill (Apr 01)
- Re: Important: IPv4 Future Allocation Concept RFC Antonio Querubin (Apr 01)
- Re: Important: IPv4 Future Allocation Concept RFC Greg D. Moore (Apr 01)
- Re: Important: IPv4 Future Allocation Concept RFC Jim Burwell (Apr 01)
- Re: Important: IPv4 Future Allocation Concept RFC William Herrin (Apr 02)