nanog mailing list archives
Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8)
From: Mark Smith <nanog () 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc nosense org>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 00:22:46 +0930
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:12:48 -0400 (EDT) Brandon Ross <bross () pobox com> wrote:
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Eliot Lear wrote:If v6 is even close to ready, wouldn't it be sad that this sort of testing isn't done at interop? Or is it just sad that v6 isn't so close to being ready? Or is it both?The suggestion was to run a "v6 only network". Does anyone on the NANOG list believe that v6 is at all ready to be run without any v4 underpinnings and provide a real service to a customer base?
I do. (And no, I'm not fantasising, my day work is involving working on productising it, and mostly that's involving supplementary things, not the essentials of a providing an IPv6 capable service).
-- Brandon Ross
Current thread:
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8), (continued)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Brandon Galbraith (Apr 05)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Leo Vegoda (Apr 05)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Apr 06)
- RE: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Schiller, Heather A (HeatherSkanks) (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 06)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) bmanning (Apr 06)
- Re: interop show network Jeroen van Aart (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Brandon Ross (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) bmanning (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Mark Smith (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network sthaug (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Leo Bicknell (Apr 07)