nanog mailing list archives
Re: Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ?
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 11:07:39 -0500
On 4/4/2010 09:56, John Sage wrote:
The degree to which people subscribed to this list, apparently having nothing better to do, will respond to a blatant troll is breathtaking.
Mama taught me to be polite and forgiving, it takes me a while to give up on a persistent idiot--I want so badly to find a way to engage them. But I do learn eventually.
Of course recent evidence shows quite clearly that [some] people subscribed to this list, apparently having nothing better to do, will respond to anything...
I am suitably chastened--kind of like being slapped with a stale bar-rag. MY apologies. but I did feel a need to respond to you. I'm over it now. -- Democracy: Three wolves and a sheep voting on the dinner menu. Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Eppure si rinfresca ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
Current thread:
- Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ? IPv3.com (Apr 04)
- Re: Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ? Larry Sheldon (Apr 04)
- Re: Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ? John Sage (Apr 04)
- Re: Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ? Larry Sheldon (Apr 04)
- Re: Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ? John Sage (Apr 04)
- Re: Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ? Michael Dillon (Apr 04)
- Re: Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ? Larry Sheldon (Apr 04)