nanog mailing list archives

Re: legacy /8


From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 01:55:21 +1100


In message <p2offcec29f1004030657r97e6b8l426be7d10252d64 () mail gmail com>, jim d
eleskie writes:
James,

 I agree with you concern, and as someone else said the devil is in
the details, you points are something that would need to be looked at
if enough people though we should move forward and look at an idea
like this, which I think we should, but not sure if enough traffic to
start down that road yet.  If we do though, this is the kind of input
we'd need.

-jim

This sort of thing was thought of and *rejected* over a decade ago.
You will still have ALL the reachability problems from legacy machines
that you have with IPv4 + IPv6.  Your Windows 95 machine wouldn't be
able to reach most of the Internet as it would be under this model.
You still need to upgrade all the application and other tools.  There
never was a magic wand that could fix this.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org


Current thread: