nanog mailing list archives
Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01]
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:47:41 -0700
On 04/22/2010 11:23 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Bill Bogstad <bogstad () pobox com> wrote:On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:03 AM, David Conrad <drc () virtualized org> wrote:On Apr 21, 2010, at 10:48 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:So what happens when you change providers? How are you going to keep using globals that now aren't yours?use pi space, request it from your local friendly RIR.And don't forget to invest in memory manufacturers and router vendors :-)Only required if those addresses are advertised to the Internet. Which is apparently NOT what people want to do with it. In addition, it seems like the RIRs frown on not publishing your IPv6 PI allocations. If you go thisthis is commonly held up as a reason that getting allocations is hard, but the infrastructure micro-allocations are never to be seen in the global table. It woudl be super nice if some kind RIR people could comment here, I believe in the ARIN region all you NEED to do is provide a spreadsheet showing your utilization, checking for the routes in the 'DFZ' (bmanning-summons) isn't relevant for additional requests.route, be sure to 'justify' as large an allocation as you could ever possibly imagine using because you'll only get one bite from that apple.see previous comment, I believe this is a red-herring.
An entity that I worked for in the arin recieved an ip6 micro-allocation (/43) under current arin policy. it was our understanding at the time that that 6.5.8.3 was current the criterion for additional assignments. while I could imagine other criterion for being applied the assignment of 4,771 /56 prefixes doesn't seem particularly onerous to document, even if as it happens, it's not particularly aligned with the initial assignment policy which was tied to the number of /48 site subnets that were assigned.
Or maybe someone could offer to advertise these deliberately unreachable addresses for a small fee and then null route any stray packets that happen to want to get there. Would this satisfy the letter (if not the spirit) for justifying PI space?you still have to provide SWIP, RWHOIS or some other accounting of the usage (spreadsheet/csvfile seems to be historically acceptable) -chrisBill Bogstad
Current thread:
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01], (continued)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Owen DeLong (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Mark Smith (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] bmanning (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] David Conrad (Apr 22)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Bill Bogstad (Apr 22)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Christopher Morrow (Apr 22)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] bmanning (Apr 22)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Joel Jaeggli (Apr 24)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Owen DeLong (Apr 22)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Mark Smith (Apr 24)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Tony Hoyle (Apr 25)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Larry Sheldon (Apr 25)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] sthaug (Apr 25)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Owen DeLong (Apr 25)
- Re: sthaug (Apr 25)
- DHCP Use (was Re: ) Larry Sheldon (Apr 25)
- Re: DHCP Use (was Re: ) Tony Hoyle (Apr 25)
- Re: DHCP Use (was Re: ) Larry Sheldon (Apr 25)