nanog mailing list archives
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
From: Dave Sparro <dsparro () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:53:26 -0400
On 4/21/2010 8:46 AM, Jim Burwell wrote:
Despite it doing the job it was intended to do, I've always seen NAT as a bit of an ugly hack, with potential to get even uglier with LSN and multi-level NAT in the future. I personally welcome a return to a NAT-less world with IPv6. :)
Don't you get all of the same problems when there is a properly restrictive SPI firewall at both ends of the connection regardless of weather NAT is used as well.
Current thread:
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?, (continued)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Chris Adams (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Joe Abley (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Owen DeLong (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Daniel Senie (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Owen DeLong (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mark Smith (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Dave Pooser (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Owen DeLong (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mark Smith (Apr 21)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Jim Burwell (Apr 21)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Dave Sparro (Apr 21)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Cutler James R (Apr 21)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Jack Bates (Apr 21)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Karl Auer (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? joel jaeggli (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Owen DeLong (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mark Andrews (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Karl Auer (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? joel jaeggli (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? William Herrin (Apr 21)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mark Smith (Apr 29)