nanog mailing list archives
Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01]
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 10:56:30 -0400
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:23 AM, David Conrad <drc () virtualized org> wrote:
On Apr 21, 2010, at 6:25 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:I agree with owen, mostly... except I think we should just push RIR's to make GUA accessible to folks that need ipv6 adress space, regardless of connectiivty to thegreater 'internet' (for some definition of that thing).See RFC 1814. Fun how history repeats itself.
yes... for those less willing to search: "Unique Addresses are Good" The abstract: The IAB suggests that while RFC 1597 establishes reserved IP address space for the use of private networks which are isolated and will remain isolated from the Internet, any enterprise which anticipates external connectivity to the Internet should apply for a globally unique address from an Internet registry or service provider. This does seem to be pretty much exactly my point (their point I suppose) Thx (as always drc) -chris
Current thread:
- [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] bmanning (Apr 20)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Owen DeLong (Apr 20)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Daniel Senie (Apr 20)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Mark Smith (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Randy Bush (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Daniel Senie (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] David Conrad (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] David Conrad (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] bmanning (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Mark Smith (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Daniel Senie (Apr 20)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Owen DeLong (Apr 20)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Owen DeLong (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Mark Smith (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] bmanning (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] David Conrad (Apr 22)