nanog mailing list archives
Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses"
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:51:45 +0530
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon () blacklotus net> wrote:
We used to have a lot of people buying IP's in bulk for SEO. They would all cancel within one or two months citing that they couldn't afford it or the project failed, etc. Guess they realized that the whole thing is a myth.
Or they burned through all those IPs, google penalized domains on those IPs for obvious SEO gaming and they've now gone off to poison some other IP space --srs
Current thread:
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses", (continued)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Jay Nakamura (Sep 22)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Joe Greco (Sep 22)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Florian Weimer (Sep 22)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Michael Holstein (Sep 22)
- RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" David Hubbard (Sep 21)
- RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" david raistrick (Sep 21)
- RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" david raistrick (Sep 21)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Jeffrey Lyon (Sep 21)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Ingo Flaschberger (Sep 21)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Adrian Chadd (Sep 21)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 21)
- RE: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" david raistrick (Sep 21)
- Re: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses" Jay Nakamura (Sep 22)