nanog mailing list archives
Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:23:04 -0700
I seem to get the impression that isis is preferred in the core. Any reasons why folks dont prefer to go with ospf?
a bit harder to attack clnp (is-is) than ip (ospf) is-is a bit simpler to configure, though you can get a sick as you want. but don't. a bit simpler to code, so worked and was stable when ospf was far flakier than it is now. randy
Current thread:
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Glen Kent (Sep 11)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Randy Bush (Sep 11)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Cord MacLeod (Sep 11)
- RE: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Fouant, Stefan (Sep 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Cord MacLeod (Sep 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Cord MacLeod (Sep 11)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Randy Bush (Sep 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP Fouant, Stefan (Sep 11)