nanog mailing list archives
Re: Multi-homed implementation and BGP convergence time
From: Kevin Loch <kloch () kl net>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:19:22 -0400
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Jay Hennigan wrote:"Tier 1", "tier 2" etc. are terms used primarily by salespeople, and don't have a lot to do with technical matters.Sure it does. If you're multihoming it will increase your AS path length.
There is no general correlation between AS path length and whether or not a network pays to exchange traffic. There is a noticeable correlation between cost and local-preference, as-path prepending, metric setting and other ways networks control how they send you traffic. This is affected by peering selectivity as well as transit prices. - Kevin
Current thread:
- Multi-homed implementation and BGP convergence time Andrew . Claybaugh (Sep 11)
- Re: Multi-homed implementation and BGP convergence time Jay Hennigan (Sep 11)
- Re: Multi-homed implementation and BGP convergence time Seth Mattinen (Sep 11)
- Re: Multi-homed implementation and BGP convergence time Kevin Loch (Sep 11)
- Re: Multi-homed implementation and BGP convergence time Seth Mattinen (Sep 11)
- Re: Multi-homed implementation and BGP convergence time Seth Mattinen (Sep 11)
- Re: Multi-homed implementation and BGP convergence time Jay Hennigan (Sep 11)
- RE: Multi-homed implementation and BGP convergence time Holmes,David A (Sep 11)
- Re: Multi-homed implementation and BGP convergence time Seth Mattinen (Sep 11)
- Re: Multi-homed implementation and BGP convergence time Andy Davidson (Sep 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Multi-homed implementation and BGP convergence time Scott Weeks (Sep 11)