nanog mailing list archives
Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation
From: Jason Bertoch <jason () i6ix com>
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:59:59 -0400
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
I've found the opposite to hold true more often. Smaller organizations can use public blacklists for free, due to their low volume, and so have little incentive to run their own local blacklist. I've typically seen the larger organizations run their own blacklists and are much more difficult to contact for removal.That said most of the larger players already attend MAAWG - that leaves rural ISPs, small universities, corporate mailservers etc etc that dont have full time postmasters, and where you're more likely to run into this issue.
Current thread:
- Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Tom Pipes (Sep 08)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Ronald Cotoni (Sep 08)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation John Curran (Sep 08)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 08)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Jason Bertoch (Sep 08)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 08)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Justin Shore (Sep 08)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Seth Mattinen (Sep 08)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Jay Hennigan (Sep 08)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Justin Shore (Sep 08)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation John Curran (Sep 08)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation J.D. Falk (Sep 08)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation William Astle (Sep 08)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Benjamin Billon (Sep 08)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Ronald Cotoni (Sep 08)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Jay Hennigan (Sep 08)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Brian Keefer (Sep 08)